TL;DR (generated · confidence: high)

Package 23,846 ("Enterprise Efficiencies") proposes reducing the compensation set-aside contingency account by $2M to fund anticipated General Fund savings of $1.7M from process improvements across seven core administrative services (procurement, HR, technology, budget, communications, engagement, equity). The package also assumes eliminating one deputy city administrator and support staff, generating approximately $300K additional General Fund savings plus $200K overhead resources from non-General Fund bureaus. Service and equity impacts are expected due to reduced personnel capacity.

Key points (each cites a PDF page):

Contingency account reduction of $2,000,000 to fund personnel reductions across seven core services (p. 279)
General Fund discretionary revenue recommended total: $2,000,000 (p. 279)
Estimated $1.7 million in General Fund savings across process improvement projects (placeholder minimum) (p. 279)
Planned elimination of one deputy city administrator position plus potential support staff (p. 279)
Additional General Fund savings of approximately $300,000 from consolidation of service areas (p. 279)
Additional $200,000 of General Fund Overhead resources to be paid by non-General Fund bureaus (p. 279)
Seven core services targeted: procurement, human resources, technology, budget and business operations, communications, engagement and equity (p. 279)
Service impacts noted: reduced levels of service expected for both external and internal customers (p. 279)

💰 $2,000,000 · $1.7M · $300,000 · $200,000 · 📋 Enterprise Efficiencies · 🏛️ Budget & Finance · DCA

23,846

Source: PDF p. 279 · raw: 279

Breadcrumb: 2 B&F › BnF-DPs › Package Details › 23,846

23,846 - Enterprise Efficiencies Service Area Budget & Finance DCA Jonas Biery Bureau Name Fund and Debt Management Director Funding Type Name Reduction Status: Recommended Package Desc Expense Recommended Total This package would reduce the amount added to the compensation set-aside contingency account in Contingency ($2,000,000) anticipation of bureau personnel reductions across seven core services that span the City ($2,000,000) organization: procurement, human resources, technology, budget and business operations, communications, engagement and equity. Revenue Recommended Total Building off existing work, project teams are engaging with subject matter experts to analyze key General Fund Discretionary ($2,000,000) processes, identify opportunities for better service delivery and elevate strategies that already work well, while streamlining duplicative efforts and aligning around citywide approaches. We are building ($2,000,000) systems that treat the City of Portland as one cohesive organization, rather than a collection of smaller organizations. The decision package estimates $1.7 million in General Fund savings across these projects – a placeholder designed to capture the minimum anticipated savings that may be achieved. Due to the distribution of these functions throughout the City (including both General Fund and non-General Fund bureaus), expense reductions are likely to produce additional savings outside the General Fund. Those potential savings are not reflected in this decision package. Work will continue over the next few months to identify more specific solutions and cost impacts. In addition to core service realignment, this decision package assumes a consolidation of service areas, eliminating one deputy city administrator to be determined, plus potential support staff -- resulting in additional General Fund savings of approximately $300,000 and an additional roughly $200,000 of General Fund Overhead resources, which are paid by non-General Fund bureaus. Service Impacts Reductions in personnel in these administrative functions will more than likely result in reduced levels of service, external and internal. A robust process would need to follow to avoid broad, non- specific cuts, which could result in greater reductions to service and effectiveness than necessary. Equity Impacts Reduced personnel will impact equity work in the City through any reductions in Equity specific programming and work as well as internal equity impacts as existing work will be placed upon remaining staff.

Parent: Package Details · PDF: p. 279